| level | latency |
|---|---|
| L1 cache (on die) | 1.4ns |
| L2 cache (off die) | 9.7ns |
| RAM (PC2700 DDR) | 28.5ns |
| Hard Drive (250 GB Maxtor 7200 RPM) | 25.6ms |
The test machine had an AMD Athlon XP 3000+ processor. Another interesting piece of data is the throuput (sustained data transfer) of the RAM, 2541 MB/s versus of the hard disk: 67 MB/s.
Note that in Intel x86 and AMD processors besides the hiearchy of cache, you also have the translation lookaside buffer (aka TLB) which is a small cache that keeps the most recent virtual-to-physical translations. This quite important if you code runs in an OS that uses virtual memory such as Windows or Linux or Solaris or MacOsX. When there is a TLB miss the CPU has to scan the page tables (living in RAM) to find the appropiate entry. This results in about 3 to 4 RAM reads. In terms of the size, the 1995 Pentium had one code TLB and two data TLBs, one of the data TLB has 64 entries (for 4Kb pages) and the other 8 entries (for 4Mb pages). The instruction TLB is 32 entries.
The biggest hit in terms of TLB-related (or virtual-to-physical translation) happens when the OS switches processes. This causes the active page tables to change which in turn requires a total (or partial) TLB invalidation.
The credits for the measures go to Diomidis Spinellis in his paper "Some Types of Memory are More Equal than Others".
1 comment:
Seeing these kind of posts reminds me of just how technology truly is something we cannot live without in this day and age, and I am fairly confident when I say that we have passed the point of no return in our relationship with technology.
I don't mean this in a bad way, of course! Ethical concerns aside... I just hope that as technology further develops, the possibility of transferring our brains onto a digital medium becomes a true reality. It's a fantasy that I dream about every once in a while.
(Posted on Nintendo DS running [url=http://www.leetboss.com/video-games/r4i-r4-sdhc-nintendo-ds]R4i SDHC[/url] DS FFBrows)
Post a Comment